Are Leisure Constraints Models Reflective or Formative?: Evidence from Confirmatory Tetrad Analyses
公開日 2018年08月03日
国際観光学研究センター（CTR）研究員である河野 慎太朗 客員研究員（Southern Illinois University）と伊藤 央二 准教授（本学観光学部）の共著論文が国際誌「Leisure Sciences」に掲載されました。
?
?
?
論文タイトル
Are Leisure Constraints Models Reflective or Formative?: Evidence from Confirmatory Tetrad Analyses
?
著者
Shintaro Kono, Department of Public Health and Recreation Professions, College of Education and Human Services, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA
Eiji Ito, Faculty of Tourism, Wakayama University, Wakayama, Japan
Angela Loucks-Atkinson, School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
?
書誌事項
Leisure Sciences, 2018
DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2018.1474508
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01490400.2018.1474508
*Scopus収録ジャーナル
収録誌詳細：https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/28910?origin=sbrowse
要旨
Kyle and Jun raised a serious question against the way researchers have specified leisure constraints measurement model: Leisure constraints measures should be formatively measured, while the dominant model has been reflective. Despite their important theoretical contributions, Kyle and Jun’s empirical evidence has limitations. The purpose of this paper is to directly examine their hypothesis by using a statistical method called confirmatory tetrad analysis in partial least squares. In Study 1, we tested nine leisure-time physical activity constraints sub-models with online survey data collected from 296 Canadians and 307 Japanese. Our results rejected the reflective model in six to seven out of the nine sub-categories. In Study 2, we re-analyzed Loucks-Atkinson and Mannell’s (2007) data, where the traditional three categories of leisure constraints were measured. Results again rejected the reflective model in two categories. Our results provide mixed, yet more direct evidence for Kyle and Jun’s argument.
?
キーワード
Confirmatory tetrad analysis, leisure constraints, measurement, partial least squares, reflective and formative models
